Case study

Legal Scheduling Automation

Court date coordination reduced from a half-hour of manual email work to a single confirmation, with permissioned mailbox access and no public availability API to rely on.

Client type
LegalTech startup serving litigation teams (sample scenario)
Industry
Enterprise Software
Duration
7 months

Sample contentSample engagement. Illustrative scenario used while the site is in build — not a named client project.

enterprise software2025

Legal Scheduling Automation

  • Java
  • Spring Boot
  • TypeScript
  • React

Scheduling a hearing meant checking court availability across inconsistent public websites, emailing opposing counsel from a personal mailbox in a compliant format, chasing follow-ups, and recording the outcome in a case management system. Every step was manual and error-prone.

A platform that composes and sends compliant correspondence from the user's own mailbox under explicit permission, tracks follow-ups, maintains a structured availability database assembled from court sources, and files the result back into case management.

Paralegal time moved from calendar administration to billable work, and the product reached paying users months earlier than a full build would have allowed.

  1. 01Business analysis with practising litigators to capture the real sequence and its exceptions
  2. 02Permissioned mailbox integration with scoped, revocable access
  3. 03Structured extraction of availability from inconsistent public sources, with change detection
  4. 04Template engine producing jurisdiction-appropriate correspondence
  5. 05MVP shipped to a pilot group before expanding scope

No API means building the adapter layer honestly

Where no public interface existed, each source got its own adapter, its own freshness check, and an alert when its structure changed. Silent staleness would have been worse than no data at all.

Start a conversation

Similar problem on your side?Let's talk.

Tell us what you are trying to build, fix or decide. If we are not the right team for it, we will say so and point you somewhere better.

Typical first step: a 30-minute call, then a short written assessment.